Rigid-pack validation
Nominal capacity is not enough to group bottles into one format family. Two containers with the same stated volume can have different neck finishes, shoulder profiles, base stability, internal volume, wall stiffness and closure systems. List every intended bottle, jar or tub and identify the combination that creates the most difficult fill, handling and closing condition.
| Pack characteristic | Why it matters | Worst-case sample to prove |
| Opening and neck finish | Limits nozzle or fill-tube access, alignment and clearance from the thread, liner or seal land. | Smallest usable opening with the tooling required for the largest dose condition. |
| Internal volume and shoulder | Controls headspace at the lowest expected bulk density and how easily aerated powder can settle. | Pack with the least usable volume at the highest-volume target fill. |
| Height, base and centre of gravity | Affects guide position, gating, acceleration, transfer and stability while the pack is open or filled. | Tallest, lightest or least stable container through normal stops and accumulation. |
| Wall stiffness and material | Changes how the pack responds to guides, gripping, vibration, static and operator handling. | Softest or most easily distorted pack at the intended line condition. |
| Closure, liner or induction foil | Requires a clean rim or thread, suitable headspace and controlled transfer from filling to closing. | Closure system most sensitive to powder contamination or alignment. |
| Label or code area | Dust, scuffing, static or container rotation can affect downstream sensing, adhesion and presentation. | Format with the smallest or most sensitive usable decoration area. |
Confirm which parts are genuinely common across the range.
A common filling head does not automatically mean common guides, sensors, stops, nozzles or closure parts. Record each change component and the setting that positions it. Where one part is adjustable across several bottles, define the reference points and first-pack check needed after adjustment. This reduces the risk of a format being released with the correct recipe but the wrong physical set-up.
Challenge missing, leaning and damaged packs without creating an uncontrolled fill.
Automatic bottle lines should prove how the system responds when a container is absent, misaligned, leaning, doubled or outside the expected height. The agreed response may stop, inhibit a fill or reject a pack depending on the machine scope, but the behaviour must preserve pack tracking and prevent powder from being discharged into an open machine area. Record the operator recovery and the status of packs immediately before and after the event.
Approve the bottle after filling, settling and closing—not at the nozzle alone.
Inspect fill result, headspace, rim or thread cleanliness, closure preparation, external dust and pack stability at the final agreed quality point. Include a refill and normal stop/restart so the sample set represents the proposed production route. Compare automatic powder filling machines, the wider powder packaging line and the full powder filling equipment range before fixing the container-handling scope.